A Resolução nº 23/2010 da UNIPAMPA, em seu Art. 8º, §3º estabelece que os instrumentos de avaliação deverão, entre outros critérios, ser embasados cientificamente.
No intuito de informar as bases científicas e empíricas que fundamentam a abordagem de gestão de desempenho na UNIPAMPA, fornecemos as seguintes referências, dentre as utilizadas para orientar o trabalho da Divisão de Avaliação de Desempenho.
Outras teorias, abordagens e áreas do conhecimento foram utilizados de forma mais ampla, oriundos da Administração (planejamento estratégico, gestão por competências, etc.) e da Psicologia (inclusive organizacional, social aplicada e social crítica). A avaliação é moldada, além disso, por outros elementos políticos, contextuais, práticos e legais.
A sugestão de teorias, artigos, livros e fontes de informações é bem-vinda e pode ser encaminhada para dadcp.progepe@unipampa.edu.br.
Referências
Achor, S. (2011). The happiness advantage: The seven principles of positive psychology that fuel success and performance at work. Random House.
Ariely, D. (2012). The (honest) truth about dishonesty. Harper Audio.
Ariely, D., Kamenica, E., & Prelec, D. (2008). Man’s search for meaning: The case of Legos. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 67(3), 671-677.
Bindl, U. K., Parker, S. K., Totterdell, P., & Hagger-Johnson, G. (2012). Fuel of the self-starter: How mood relates to proactive goal regulation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 134.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New Yprk: Harper Collins.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Beyond boredom and anxiety. Jossey-Bass.
De Botton, A. (2010). The pleasures and sorrows of work. Emblem Editions.
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological bulletin, 125(6), 627.
Delamater, J. D., Michener, H. A., & Myers, D. J. (2005) Psicologia Social. Thompson Pioneira.
Fisher, C. D. (1978). The effects of personal control, competence, and extrinsic reward systems on intrinsic motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 21(3), 273-288.
Gergen, K. J. (2008). A psicologia social como história. Psicologia & Sociedade, 20(3), 475-484.
Grant, A. M. (2008). The significance of task significance: Job performance effects, relational mechanisms, and boundary conditions. Journal of applied psychology, 93(1), 108.
Guareschi, P. A. (2004). Psicologia social crítica. Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS.
Harrison, D. A., Virick, M., & William, S. (1996). Working without a net: Time, performance, and turnover under maximally contingent rewards. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4), 331.
Heyman, J., & Ariely, D. (2004). Effort for payment a tale of two markets. Psychological science, 15(11), 787-793.
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (Vol. 2). London: McGraw-Hill.
Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: a meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1332.
Jiang, K., Liu, D., McKay, P. F., Lee, T. W., & Mitchell, T. R. (2012). When and how is job embeddedness predictive of turnover? A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5), 1077.
King, A. & Crewe, I. (2013, 19 de setembro). From Flawed to Fool-proof: How to do Policy Better. Recuperado de: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oDZNI8Fpfes
Linley, P. A., & Harrington, S. (2010). Oxford handbook of positive psychology and work. Oxford University Press, USA.
Madjar, N., Greenberg, E., & Chen, Z. (2011). Factors for radical creativity, incremental creativity, and routine, noncreative performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 730.
Muraven, M., Rosman, H., & Gagné, M. (2007). Lack of autonomy and self-control: Performance contingent rewards lead to greater depletion. Motivation and Emotion, 31(4), 322-330.
Neely, A. (2007). Business Performance Measurement: unifying theory and integrating practice. Cambridge University Press.
Orges-Andrade, J. E., Bastos, A. V. B., & Zanelli, J. C. (2004). Psicologia, organizações e trabalho no Brasil. Porto Alegre: Artmed.
Pink, D. H. (2011). Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us. Penguin.
Ramesh, A., & Gelfand, M. J. (2010). Will they stay or will they go? The role of job embeddedness in predicting turnover in individualistic and collectivistic cultures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 807.
Ringen, S. (2013, 7 de novembro). What is Power? Recuperado de: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUWr6eYE9Sk
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, 55(1), 68.
Schwartz, B., & Sharpe, K. (2010). Practical wisdom: The right way to do the right thing. Penguin.
Whitman, D. S., Caleo, S., Carpenter, N. C., Horner, M. T., & Bernerth, J. B. (2012). Fairness at the collective level: A meta-analytic examination of the consequences and boundary conditions of organizational justice climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(4), 776.
Woolhandler, S., Ariely, D., & Himmelstein, D. U. (2012). Why pay for performance may be incompatible with quality improvement. Bmj, 345(7870), e5015.
Wright, T. A., & Cropanzano, R. (2000). Psychological well-being and job satisfaction as predictors of job performance. Journal of occupational health psychology, 5(1), 84.
Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). The influence of creative process engagement on employee creative performance and overall job performance: a curvilinear assessment. Journal of Applied psychology, 95(5), 862.